summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/media/kiss_fft/BACKGROUND
blob: dd43fa535a52812e66a96e18378d1aa7fa1ae912 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BACKGROUND:

    I started coding this because I couldn't find a fixed point FFT that didn't 
use assembly code.  I started with floating point numbers so I could get the 
theory straight before working on fixed point issues.  In the end, I had a 
little bit of code that could be recompiled easily to do ffts with short, float
or double (other types should be easy too).  

    Once I got my FFT working, I was curious about the speed compared to
a well respected and highly optimized fft library.  I don't want to criticize 
this great library, so let's call it FFT_BRANDX.
During this process, I learned:

    1. FFT_BRANDX has more than 100K lines of code. The core of kiss_fft is about 500 lines (cpx 1-d).
    2. It took me an embarrassingly long time to get FFT_BRANDX working.
    3. A simple program using FFT_BRANDX is 522KB. A similar program using kiss_fft is 18KB (without optimizing for size).
    4. FFT_BRANDX is roughly twice as fast as KISS FFT in default mode.

    It is wonderful that free, highly optimized libraries like FFT_BRANDX exist.
But such libraries carry a huge burden of complexity necessary to extract every 
last bit of performance.

    Sometimes simpler is better, even if it's not better.
    
    -- Mark Borgerding