1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
|
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
class="reftest-wait"
onload="document.documentElement.setCurrentTime(1);
setTimeAndSnapshot(1, false)">
<!-- XXXdholbert the above "document.documentElement.setCurrentTime" call
shouldn't be necessary - it's a temporary workaround for Bug 552873 -->
<script xlink:href="smil-util.js" type="text/javascript"/>
<!-- This test consists of a 4x3 grid, containing various cases with
animations that have attributeType="CSS" vs "XML", for the
presentational ("mapped") attribute 'fill-opacity'.
As one would expect, the "CSS" and "XML" versions are treated as
separate animation targets. However, there are some interactions:
- When they conflict, both the inline style & any animations with
attributeType="CSS" will have higher priority than the XML attribute
and animations with attributeType="XML".
- However, as described in the "FIRST ROW" comment below, animations
with attributeType="XML" can sometimes feed in to the base value
used for animations with attributeType="CSS". -->
<!-- GIANT GREEN BACKGROUND -->
<!-- (We'll put red rects on top, and then animate them to be transparent -->
<rect height="100%" width="100%" fill="lime" />
<!-- FIRST ROW: Additive CSS and XML animations, with CSS or XML base values.
When the base value is set using the inline style attribute, the
attributeType="XML" animation should be ignored, because the XML
attribute gets masked by the inline style.
However, when the base value is set using the XML attribute (or more
generally, when attributeType="XML" animations aren't masked by a value
in the inline style or in a stylesheet), then the animations will
effectively add together, because the (animated) XML attribute feeds
into the computed style, which gets used as the base value for the CSS
animation. -->
<g>
<!-- CSS base value + CSS animation + XML animation -->
<rect x="0" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
by="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
by="-0.5" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- CSS base value + XML animation + CSS animation -->
<rect x="50" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
by="-0.5" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
by="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + CSS animation + XML animation -->
<rect x="100" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
by="-0.2" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
by="-0.3" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + XML animation + CSS animation -->
<rect x="150" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
by="-0.2" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
by="-0.3" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
</g>
<!-- SECOND ROW: Single animation, with CSS or XML attributeType & base value.
In every case except for CSS-base-value + XML animation, the animation
should take effect. -->
<g transform="translate(0, 50)">
<!-- CSS base value + CSS animation -->
<rect x="0" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- CSS base value + XML animation -->
<!-- (starting at fill-opacity 0, since anim shouldn't have any effect -->
<rect x="50" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="0.5" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + CSS animation -->
<rect x="100" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + XML animation -->
<rect x="150" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
</g>
<!-- THIRD ROW: Competing animations, with CSS or XML attributeType & base
value. In each case, the attributeType="CSS" animation should win. -->
<g transform="translate(0, 100)">
<!-- CSS base value + CSS animation animation vs XML animation -->
<rect x="0" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- CSS base value + XML animation vs CSS animation -->
<rect x="50" width="50" height="50" fill="red" style="fill-opacity: 0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + CSS animation vs XML animation -->
<rect x="100" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
<!-- XML base value + XML animation vs CSS animation -->
<rect x="150" width="50" height="50" fill="red" fill-opacity="0.5">
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="XML"
to="1" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
<animate attributeName="fill-opacity" attributeType="CSS"
to="0" dur="1s" fill="freeze"/>
</rect>
</g>
</svg>
|
