diff options
author | Matt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain> | 2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain> | 2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500 |
commit | 5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8 (patch) | |
tree | 10027f336435511475e392454359edea8e25895d /toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js | |
parent | 49ee0794b5d912db1f95dce6eb52d781dc210db5 (diff) | |
download | UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.gz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.lz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.xz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.zip |
Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0
Diffstat (limited to 'toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js')
-rw-r--r-- | toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js | 488 |
1 files changed, 488 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js b/toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1ed65c7ba --- /dev/null +++ b/toolkit/components/url-classifier/tests/unit/test_addsub.js @@ -0,0 +1,488 @@ + +function doTest(updates, assertions) +{ + doUpdateTest(updates, assertions, runNextTest, updateError); +} + +// Test an add of two urls to a fresh database +function testSimpleAdds() { + var addUrls = [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b", "bar.com/c" ]; + var update = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls + }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1", + "urlsExist" : addUrls + }; + + doTest([update], assertions); +} + +// Same as testSimpleAdds, but make the same-domain URLs come from different +// chunks. +function testMultipleAdds() { + var add1Urls = [ "foo.com/a", "bar.com/c" ]; + var add2Urls = [ "foo.com/b" ]; + + var update = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : add1Urls }, + { "chunkNum" : 2, + "urls" : add2Urls }]); + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1-2", + "urlsExist" : add1Urls.concat(add2Urls) + }; + + doTest([update], assertions); +} + +// Test that a sub will remove an existing add +function testSimpleSub() +{ + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a", "bar.com/b"]; + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a"]; + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, // adds and subtracts don't share a chunk numbering space + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 50, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls }]); + + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:50", + "urlsExist" : [ "bar.com/b" ], + "urlsDontExist": ["foo.com/a" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a" ] + } + + doTest([addUpdate, subUpdate], assertions); + +} + +// Same as testSimpleSub(), but the sub comes in before the add. +function testSubEmptiesAdd() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a"]; + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a", "bar.com/b"]; + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 50, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls }]); + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:50", + "urlsExist" : [ "bar.com/b" ], + "urlsDontExist": ["foo.com/a" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a" ] // this sub was found, it shouldn't exist anymore + } + + doTest([subUpdate, addUpdate], assertions); +} + +// Very similar to testSubEmptiesAdd, except that the domain entry will +// still have an item left over that needs to be synced. +function testSubPartiallyEmptiesAdd() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a"]; + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a", "foo.com/b", "bar.com/b"]; + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls }]); + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, // adds and subtracts don't share a chunk numbering space + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:1", + "urlsExist" : [ "foo.com/b", "bar.com/b" ], + "urlsDontExist" : ["foo.com/a" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a" ] // this sub was found, it shouldn't exist anymore + } + + doTest([subUpdate, addUpdate], assertions); +} + +// We SHOULD be testing that pending subs are removed using +// subsDontExist assertions. Since we don't have a good interface for getting +// at sub entries, we'll verify it by side-effect. Subbing a url once +// then adding it twice should leave the url intact. +function testPendingSubRemoved() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a", "2:foo.com/b"]; + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a", "foo.com/b"]; + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls }]); + + var addUpdate1 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, // adds and subtracts don't share a chunk numbering space + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var addUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1-2:s:1", + "urlsExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ] // this sub was found, it shouldn't exist anymore + } + + doTest([subUpdate, addUpdate1, addUpdate2], assertions); +} + +// Make sure that a saved sub is removed when the sub chunk is expired. +function testPendingSubExpire() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a", "1:foo.com/b"]; + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a", "foo.com/b"]; + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls }]); + + var expireUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "sd" }]); + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, // adds and subtracts don't share a chunk numbering space + "urls": addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1", + "urlsExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ] // this sub was expired + } + + doTest([subUpdate, expireUpdate, addUpdate], assertions); +} + +// Make sure that the sub url removes from only the chunk that it specifies +function testDuplicateAdds() +{ + var urls = ["foo.com/a"]; + + var addUpdate1 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls": urls }]); + var addUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "urls": urls }]); + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 3, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": ["2:foo.com/a"]}]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1-2:s:3", + "urlsExist" : [ "foo.com/a"], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a"] + } + + doTest([addUpdate1, addUpdate2, subUpdate], assertions); +} + +// Tests a sub which matches some existing adds but leaves others. +function testSubPartiallyMatches() +{ + var subUrls = ["foo.com/a"]; + var addUrls = ["1:foo.com/a", "2:foo.com/b"]; + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls }]); + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:1", + "urlsDontExist" : ["foo.com/a"], + "subsDontExist" : ["foo.com/a"], + "subsExist" : ["foo.com/b"] + }; + + doTest([addUpdate, subUpdate], assertions); +} + +// XXX: because subsExist isn't actually implemented, this is the same +// test as above but with a second add chunk that should fail to be added +// because of a pending sub chunk. +function testSubPartiallyMatches2() +{ + var addUrls = ["foo.com/a"]; + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a", "2:foo.com/b"]; + var addUrls2 = ["foo.com/b"]; + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls }]); + + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : subUrls }]); + + var addUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "urls" : addUrls2 }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1-2:s:1", + "urlsDontExist" : ["foo.com/a", "foo.com/b"], + "subsDontExist" : ["foo.com/a", "foo.com/b"] + }; + + doTest([addUpdate, subUpdate, addUpdate2], assertions); +} + +// Verify that two subs for the same domain but from different chunks +// match (tests that existing sub entries are properly updated) +function testSubsDifferentChunks() { + var subUrls1 = [ "3:foo.com/a" ]; + var subUrls2 = [ "3:foo.com/b" ]; + + var addUrls = [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b", "foo.com/c" ]; + + var subUpdate1 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls1 }]); + var subUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : subUrls2 }]); + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 3, + "urls" : addUrls }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:3:s:1-2", + "urlsExist" : [ "foo.com/c" ], + "urlsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ], + "subsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ] + }; + + doTest([subUpdate1, subUpdate2, addUpdate], assertions); +} + +// for bug 534079 +function testSubsDifferentChunksSameHostId() { + var subUrls1 = [ "1:foo.com/a" ]; + var subUrls2 = [ "1:foo.com/b", "2:foo.com/c" ]; + + var addUrls = [ "foo.com/a", "foo.com/b" ]; + var addUrls2 = [ "foo.com/c" ]; + + var subUpdate1 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls": subUrls1 }]); + var subUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : subUrls2 }]); + + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls }]); + var addUpdate2 = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 2, + "urls" : addUrls2 }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1-2:s:1-2", + "urlsDontExist" : [ "foo.com/c", "foo.com/b", "foo.com/a", ], + }; + + doTest([addUpdate, addUpdate2, subUpdate1, subUpdate2], assertions); +} + +// Test lists of expired chunks +function testExpireLists() { + var addUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : [ "foo.com/a" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 3, + "urls" : [ "bar.com/a" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 4, + "urls" : [ "baz.com/a" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 5, + "urls" : [ "blah.com/a" ] + }, + ]); + var subUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : [ "50:foo.com/1" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 2, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : [ "50:bar.com/1" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 3, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : [ "50:baz.com/1" ] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 5, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : [ "50:blah.com/1" ] + }, + ]); + + var expireUpdate = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ { "chunkType" : "ad:1,3-5" }, + { "chunkType" : "sd:1-3,5" }]); + + var assertions = { + // "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;" + "tableData": "" + }; + + doTest([addUpdate, subUpdate, expireUpdate], assertions); +} + +// Test a duplicate add chunk. +function testDuplicateAddChunks() { + var addUrls1 = [ "foo.com/a" ]; + var addUrls2 = [ "bar.com/b" ]; + var update = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls1 + }, + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : addUrls2 + }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1", + "urlsExist" : addUrls1, + "urlsDontExist" : addUrls2 + }; + + doTest([update], assertions); +} + +// This test is a bit tricky. We want to test that an add removes all +// subs with the same add chunk id, even if there is no match. To do +// that we need to add the same add chunk twice, with an expiration +// in the middle. This would be easier if subsDontExist actually +// worked... +function testExpireWholeSub() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a"]; + + var update = buildPhishingUpdate( + [{ "chunkNum" : 5, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : subUrls + }, + // empty add chunk should still cause foo.com/a to go away. + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : [] + }, + // and now adding chunk 1 again with foo.com/a should succeed, + // because the sub should have been expired with the empty + // add chunk. + + // we need to expire this chunk to let us add chunk 1 again. + { + "chunkType" : "ad:1" + }, + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : [ "foo.com/a" ] + }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:5", + "urlsExist" : ["foo.com/a"] + }; + + doTest([update], assertions); +} + + +// This test is roughly the opposite of testExpireWholeSub(). We add +// the empty add first, and make sure that it prevents a sub for that +// add from being applied. +function testPreventWholeSub() +{ + var subUrls = ["1:foo.com/a"]; + + var update = buildPhishingUpdate( + [ // empty add chunk should cause foo.com/a to not be saved + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : [] + }, + { "chunkNum" : 5, + "chunkType" : "s", + "urls" : subUrls + }, + // and now adding chunk 1 again with foo.com/a should succeed, + // because the sub should have been expired with the empty + // add chunk. + + // we need to expire this chunk to let us add chunk 1 again. + { + "chunkType" : "ad:1" + }, + { "chunkNum" : 1, + "urls" : [ "foo.com/a" ] + }]); + + var assertions = { + "tableData" : "test-phish-simple;a:1:s:5", + "urlsExist" : ["foo.com/a"] + }; + + doTest([update], assertions); +} + +function run_test() +{ + runTests([ + testSimpleAdds, + testMultipleAdds, + testSimpleSub, + testSubEmptiesAdd, + testSubPartiallyEmptiesAdd, + testPendingSubRemoved, + testPendingSubExpire, + testDuplicateAdds, + testSubPartiallyMatches, + testSubPartiallyMatches2, + testSubsDifferentChunks, + testSubsDifferentChunksSameHostId, + testExpireLists + ]); +} + +do_test_pending(); |