# HG changeset patch # User Jeff Muizelaar # Date 1299543337 18000 # Node ID 57f411f16517fa3abc31b6b081dd31420c4d9b45 # Parent e56ecd8b3a68c158025207c5fd081d043e28f5ce Bug 637828. Reset the transform on the dest image. r=joe We can get into a situation where the destination image has a transform because we use it as source. The transform set when the image is a source sticks around and when we use it as a destination pixman gets confused. It seems like the code at fault here is really pixman. I think that pixman should probably not be using a transformed fetch on the destination image under any circumstances. For example, in this case we're fetching destination pixels from a different part of the image than we're storing them to. I can't see any reason for wanting this behaviour. However, reseting the transform seemed like the easiest solution. diff --git a/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-image-surface.c b/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-image-surface.c --- a/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-image-surface.c +++ b/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-image-surface.c @@ -1138,16 +1138,27 @@ _cairo_image_surface_composite (cairo_op return status; status = _cairo_image_surface_set_attributes (src, &src_attr, dst_x + width / 2., dst_y + height / 2.); if (unlikely (status)) goto CLEANUP_SURFACES; + /* we sometimes get destinations with transforms. + * we're not equiped to deal with this */ + { + static const pixman_transform_t id = { + {{ pixman_fixed_1, 0, 0 }, + { 0, pixman_fixed_1, 0 }, + { 0, 0, pixman_fixed_1 }} + }; + pixman_image_set_transform (dst->pixman_image, &id); + } + if (mask) { status = _cairo_image_surface_set_attributes (mask, &mask_attr, dst_x + width / 2., dst_y + height / 2.); if (unlikely (status)) goto CLEANUP_SURFACES; pixman_image_composite (_pixman_operator (op),