1 files changed, 231 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/hash.h b/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/hash.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3640b8982
--- /dev/null
+++ b/toolkit/components/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/stubs/hash.h
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.  All rights reserved.
+// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Author: kenton@google.com (Kenton Varda)
+//
+// Deals with the fact that hash_map is not defined everywhere.
+
+#ifndef GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_STUBS_HASH_H__
+#define GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_STUBS_HASH_H__
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/stubs/common.h>
+
+#if defined(HAVE_HASH_MAP) && defined(HAVE_HASH_SET)
+#include HASH_MAP_H
+#include HASH_SET_H
+#else
+#define MISSING_HASH
+#include <map>
+#include <set>
+#endif
+
+namespace google {
+namespace protobuf {
+
+#ifdef MISSING_HASH
+
+// This system doesn't have hash_map or hash_set.  Emulate them using map and
+// set.
+
+// Make hash<T> be the same as less<T>.  Note that everywhere where custom
+// hash functions are defined in the protobuf code, they are also defined such
+// that they can be used as "less" functions, which is required by MSVC anyway.
+template <typename Key>
+struct hash {
+  // Dummy, just to make derivative hash functions compile.
+  int operator()(const Key& key) {
+    GOOGLE_LOG(FATAL) << "Should never be called.";
+    return 0;
+  }
+
+  inline bool operator()(const Key& a, const Key& b) const {
+    return a < b;
+  }
+};
+
+// Make sure char* is compared by value.
+template <>
+struct hash<const char*> {
+  // Dummy, just to make derivative hash functions compile.
+  int operator()(const char* key) {
+    GOOGLE_LOG(FATAL) << "Should never be called.";
+    return 0;
+  }
+
+  inline bool operator()(const char* a, const char* b) const {
+    return strcmp(a, b) < 0;
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename Key, typename Data,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = int >
+class hash_map : public std::map<Key, Data, HashFcn> {
+ public:
+  hash_map(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+template <typename Key,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = int >
+class hash_set : public std::set<Key, HashFcn> {
+ public:
+  hash_set(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER) && !defined(_STLPORT_VERSION)
+
+template <typename Key>
+struct hash : public HASH_NAMESPACE::hash_compare<Key> {
+};
+
+// MSVC's hash_compare<const char*> hashes based on the string contents but
+// compares based on the string pointer.  WTF?
+class CstringLess {
+ public:
+  inline bool operator()(const char* a, const char* b) const {
+    return strcmp(a, b) < 0;
+  }
+};
+
+template <>
+struct hash<const char*>
+  : public HASH_NAMESPACE::hash_compare<const char*, CstringLess> {
+};
+
+template <typename Key, typename Data,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = int >
+class hash_map : public HASH_NAMESPACE::hash_map<
+    Key, Data, HashFcn> {
+ public:
+  hash_map(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+template <typename Key,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = int >
+class hash_set : public HASH_NAMESPACE::hash_set<
+    Key, HashFcn> {
+ public:
+  hash_set(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+#else
+
+template <typename Key>
+struct hash : public HASH_NAMESPACE::hash<Key> {
+};
+
+template <typename Key>
+struct hash<const Key*> {
+  inline size_t operator()(const Key* key) const {
+    return reinterpret_cast<size_t>(key);
+  }
+};
+
+// Unlike the old SGI version, the TR1 "hash" does not special-case char*.  So,
+// we go ahead and provide our own implementation.
+template <>
+struct hash<const char*> {
+  inline size_t operator()(const char* str) const {
+    size_t result = 0;
+    for (; *str != '\0'; str++) {
+      result = 5 * result + *str;
+    }
+    return result;
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename Key, typename Data,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = std::equal_to<Key> >
+class hash_map : public HASH_NAMESPACE::HASH_MAP_CLASS<
+    Key, Data, HashFcn, EqualKey> {
+ public:
+  hash_map(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+template <typename Key,
+          typename HashFcn = hash<Key>,
+          typename EqualKey = std::equal_to<Key> >
+class hash_set : public HASH_NAMESPACE::HASH_SET_CLASS<
+    Key, HashFcn, EqualKey> {
+ public:
+  hash_set(int = 0) {}
+};
+
+#endif
+
+template <>
+struct hash<string> {
+  inline size_t operator()(const string& key) const {
+    return hash<const char*>()(key.c_str());
+  }
+
+  static const size_t bucket_size = 4;
+  static const size_t min_buckets = 8;
+  inline size_t operator()(const string& a, const string& b) const {
+    return a < b;
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename First, typename Second>
+struct hash<pair<First, Second> > {
+  inline size_t operator()(const pair<First, Second>& key) const {
+    size_t first_hash = hash<First>()(key.first);
+    size_t second_hash = hash<Second>()(key.second);
+
+    // FIXME(kenton):  What is the best way to compute this hash?  I have
+    // no idea!  This seems a bit better than an XOR.
+    return first_hash * ((1 << 16) - 1) + second_hash;
+  }
+
+  static const size_t bucket_size = 4;
+  static const size_t min_buckets = 8;
+  inline size_t operator()(const pair<First, Second>& a,
+                           const pair<First, Second>& b) const {
+    return a < b;
+  }
+};
+
+// Used by GCC/SGI STL only.  (Why isn't this provided by the standard
+// library?  :( )
+struct streq {
+  inline bool operator()(const char* a, const char* b) const {
+    return strcmp(a, b) == 0;
+  }
+};
+
+}  // namespace protobuf
+}  // namespace google
+
+#endif  // GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_STUBS_HASH_H__