diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'js/src/tests/ecma_6/TemplateStrings/templLit.js')
-rw-r--r-- | js/src/tests/ecma_6/TemplateStrings/templLit.js | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/tests/ecma_6/TemplateStrings/templLit.js b/js/src/tests/ecma_6/TemplateStrings/templLit.js new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0b85ad7d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/ecma_6/TemplateStrings/templLit.js @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public +// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this +// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. + +// This test case is weird in the sense the actual work happens at the eval +// at the end. If template strings are not enabled, the test cases would throw +// a syntax error and we'd have failure reported. To avoid that, the entire +// test case is commented out and is part of a function. We use toString to +// get the string version, obtain the actual lines to run, and then use eval to +// do the actual evaluation. + +function syntaxError (script) { + try { + Function(script); + } catch (e) { + if (e.name === "SyntaxError") { + return; + } + } + throw new Error('Expected syntax error: ' + script); +} + +// TEST BEGIN + + + +// combinations of substitutions +assertEq("abcdef", `ab${"cd"}ef`); +assertEq("ab9ef", `ab${4+5}ef`); +assertEq("cdef", `${"cd"}ef`); +assertEq("abcd", `ab${"cd"}`); +assertEq("cd", `${"cd"}`); +assertEq("", `${""}`); +assertEq("4", `${4}`); + +// multiple substitutions +assertEq("abcdef", `ab${"cd"}e${"f"}`); +assertEq("abcdef", `ab${"cd"}${"e"}f`); +assertEq("abcdef", `a${"b"}${"cd"}e${"f"}`); +assertEq("abcdef", `${"ab"}${"cd"}${"ef"}`); + +// inception +assertEq("abcdef", `a${`b${"cd"}e${"f"}`}`); + +syntaxError("`${}`"); +syntaxError("`${`"); +syntaxError("`${\\n}`"); +syntaxError("`${yield 0}`"); + +// Extra whitespace inside a template substitution is ignored. +assertEq(`${ +0 +}`, "0"); + +assertEq(`${ // Comments work in template substitutions. +// Even comments that look like code: +// 0}`, "FAIL"); /* NOTE: This whole line is a comment. +0}`, "0"); + +// Template substitutions are expressions, not statements. +syntaxError("`${0;}`"); +assertEq(`${{}}`, "[object Object]"); +assertEq(`${ + function f() { + return "ok"; + }() +}`, "ok"); + +// Template substitutions can have side effects. +var x = 0; +assertEq(`= ${x += 1}`, "= 1"); +assertEq(x, 1); + +// The production for a template substitution is Expression, not +// AssignmentExpression. +x = 0; +assertEq(`${++x, "o"}k`, "ok"); +assertEq(x, 1); + +// --> is not a comment inside a template. +assertEq(` +--> this is text +`, "\n--> this is text\n"); + +// reentrancy +function f(n) { + if (n === 0) + return ""; + return `${n}${f(n - 1)}`; +} +assertEq(f(9), "987654321"); + +// Template string substitutions in generator functions can yield. +function* g() { + return `${yield 1} ${yield 2}`; +} + +var it = g(); +var next = it.next(); +assertEq(next.done, false); +assertEq(next.value, 1); +next = it.next("hello"); +assertEq(next.done, false); +assertEq(next.value, 2); +next = it.next("world"); +assertEq(next.done, true); +assertEq(next.value, "hello world"); + +// undefined +assertEq(`${void 0}`, "undefined"); +assertEq(`${Object.doesNotHaveThisProperty}`, "undefined"); + +// toString behavior +assertEq("<toString>", `${{valueOf: () => "<valueOf>", toString: () => "<toString>"}}`); +assertEq("Hi 42", Function("try {`${{toString: () => { throw 42;}}}`} catch(e) {return \"Hi \" + e;}")()); + + +reportCompare(0, 0, "ok"); |