summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain>2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500
committerMatt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain>2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500
commit5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8 (patch)
tree10027f336435511475e392454359edea8e25895d /python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt
parent49ee0794b5d912db1f95dce6eb52d781dc210db5 (diff)
downloadUXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.gz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.lz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.xz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.zip
Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0
Diffstat (limited to 'python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt')
-rw-r--r--python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt583
1 files changed, 583 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt b/python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..571b71d5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/python/mock-1.0.0/docs/helpers.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,583 @@
+=========
+ Helpers
+=========
+
+.. currentmodule:: mock
+
+.. testsetup::
+
+ mock.FILTER_DIR = True
+ from pprint import pprint as pp
+ original_dir = dir
+ def dir(obj):
+ print pp(original_dir(obj))
+
+ import urllib2
+ __main__.urllib2 = urllib2
+
+.. testcleanup::
+
+ dir = original_dir
+ mock.FILTER_DIR = True
+
+
+
+call
+====
+
+.. function:: call(*args, **kwargs)
+
+ `call` is a helper object for making simpler assertions, for comparing
+ with :attr:`~Mock.call_args`, :attr:`~Mock.call_args_list`,
+ :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` and :attr: `~Mock.method_calls`. `call` can also be
+ used with :meth:`~Mock.assert_has_calls`.
+
+ .. doctest::
+
+ >>> m = MagicMock(return_value=None)
+ >>> m(1, 2, a='foo', b='bar')
+ >>> m()
+ >>> m.call_args_list == [call(1, 2, a='foo', b='bar'), call()]
+ True
+
+.. method:: call.call_list()
+
+ For a call object that represents multiple calls, `call_list`
+ returns a list of all the intermediate calls as well as the
+ final call.
+
+`call_list` is particularly useful for making assertions on "chained calls". A
+chained call is multiple calls on a single line of code. This results in
+multiple entries in :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` on a mock. Manually constructing
+the sequence of calls can be tedious.
+
+:meth:`~call.call_list` can construct the sequence of calls from the same
+chained call:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> m = MagicMock()
+ >>> m(1).method(arg='foo').other('bar')(2.0)
+ <MagicMock name='mock().method().other()()' id='...'>
+ >>> kall = call(1).method(arg='foo').other('bar')(2.0)
+ >>> kall.call_list()
+ [call(1),
+ call().method(arg='foo'),
+ call().method().other('bar'),
+ call().method().other()(2.0)]
+ >>> m.mock_calls == kall.call_list()
+ True
+
+.. _calls-as-tuples:
+
+A `call` object is either a tuple of (positional args, keyword args) or
+(name, positional args, keyword args) depending on how it was constructed. When
+you construct them yourself this isn't particularly interesting, but the `call`
+objects that are in the :attr:`Mock.call_args`, :attr:`Mock.call_args_list` and
+:attr:`Mock.mock_calls` attributes can be introspected to get at the individual
+arguments they contain.
+
+The `call` objects in :attr:`Mock.call_args` and :attr:`Mock.call_args_list`
+are two-tuples of (positional args, keyword args) whereas the `call` objects
+in :attr:`Mock.mock_calls`, along with ones you construct yourself, are
+three-tuples of (name, positional args, keyword args).
+
+You can use their "tupleness" to pull out the individual arguments for more
+complex introspection and assertions. The positional arguments are a tuple
+(an empty tuple if there are no positional arguments) and the keyword
+arguments are a dictionary:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> m = MagicMock(return_value=None)
+ >>> m(1, 2, 3, arg='one', arg2='two')
+ >>> kall = m.call_args
+ >>> args, kwargs = kall
+ >>> args
+ (1, 2, 3)
+ >>> kwargs
+ {'arg2': 'two', 'arg': 'one'}
+ >>> args is kall[0]
+ True
+ >>> kwargs is kall[1]
+ True
+
+ >>> m = MagicMock()
+ >>> m.foo(4, 5, 6, arg='two', arg2='three')
+ <MagicMock name='mock.foo()' id='...'>
+ >>> kall = m.mock_calls[0]
+ >>> name, args, kwargs = kall
+ >>> name
+ 'foo'
+ >>> args
+ (4, 5, 6)
+ >>> kwargs
+ {'arg2': 'three', 'arg': 'two'}
+ >>> name is m.mock_calls[0][0]
+ True
+
+
+create_autospec
+===============
+
+.. function:: create_autospec(spec, spec_set=False, instance=False, **kwargs)
+
+ Create a mock object using another object as a spec. Attributes on the
+ mock will use the corresponding attribute on the `spec` object as their
+ spec.
+
+ Functions or methods being mocked will have their arguments checked to
+ ensure that they are called with the correct signature.
+
+ If `spec_set` is `True` then attempting to set attributes that don't exist
+ on the spec object will raise an `AttributeError`.
+
+ If a class is used as a spec then the return value of the mock (the
+ instance of the class) will have the same spec. You can use a class as the
+ spec for an instance object by passing `instance=True`. The returned mock
+ will only be callable if instances of the mock are callable.
+
+ `create_autospec` also takes arbitrary keyword arguments that are passed to
+ the constructor of the created mock.
+
+See :ref:`auto-speccing` for examples of how to use auto-speccing with
+`create_autospec` and the `autospec` argument to :func:`patch`.
+
+
+ANY
+===
+
+.. data:: ANY
+
+Sometimes you may need to make assertions about *some* of the arguments in a
+call to mock, but either not care about some of the arguments or want to pull
+them individually out of :attr:`~Mock.call_args` and make more complex
+assertions on them.
+
+To ignore certain arguments you can pass in objects that compare equal to
+*everything*. Calls to :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` and
+:meth:`~Mock.assert_called_once_with` will then succeed no matter what was
+passed in.
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> mock = Mock(return_value=None)
+ >>> mock('foo', bar=object())
+ >>> mock.assert_called_once_with('foo', bar=ANY)
+
+`ANY` can also be used in comparisons with call lists like
+:attr:`~Mock.mock_calls`:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> m = MagicMock(return_value=None)
+ >>> m(1)
+ >>> m(1, 2)
+ >>> m(object())
+ >>> m.mock_calls == [call(1), call(1, 2), ANY]
+ True
+
+
+
+FILTER_DIR
+==========
+
+.. data:: FILTER_DIR
+
+`FILTER_DIR` is a module level variable that controls the way mock objects
+respond to `dir` (only for Python 2.6 or more recent). The default is `True`,
+which uses the filtering described below, to only show useful members. If you
+dislike this filtering, or need to switch it off for diagnostic purposes, then
+set `mock.FILTER_DIR = False`.
+
+With filtering on, `dir(some_mock)` shows only useful attributes and will
+include any dynamically created attributes that wouldn't normally be shown.
+If the mock was created with a `spec` (or `autospec` of course) then all the
+attributes from the original are shown, even if they haven't been accessed
+yet:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> dir(Mock())
+ ['assert_any_call',
+ 'assert_called_once_with',
+ 'assert_called_with',
+ 'assert_has_calls',
+ 'attach_mock',
+ ...
+ >>> import urllib2
+ >>> dir(Mock(spec=urllib2))
+ ['AbstractBasicAuthHandler',
+ 'AbstractDigestAuthHandler',
+ 'AbstractHTTPHandler',
+ 'BaseHandler',
+ ...
+
+Many of the not-very-useful (private to `Mock` rather than the thing being
+mocked) underscore and double underscore prefixed attributes have been
+filtered from the result of calling `dir` on a `Mock`. If you dislike this
+behaviour you can switch it off by setting the module level switch
+`FILTER_DIR`:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> import mock
+ >>> mock.FILTER_DIR = False
+ >>> dir(mock.Mock())
+ ['_NonCallableMock__get_return_value',
+ '_NonCallableMock__get_side_effect',
+ '_NonCallableMock__return_value_doc',
+ '_NonCallableMock__set_return_value',
+ '_NonCallableMock__set_side_effect',
+ '__call__',
+ '__class__',
+ ...
+
+Alternatively you can just use `vars(my_mock)` (instance members) and
+`dir(type(my_mock))` (type members) to bypass the filtering irrespective of
+`mock.FILTER_DIR`.
+
+
+mock_open
+=========
+
+.. function:: mock_open(mock=None, read_data=None)
+
+ A helper function to create a mock to replace the use of `open`. It works
+ for `open` called directly or used as a context manager.
+
+ The `mock` argument is the mock object to configure. If `None` (the
+ default) then a `MagicMock` will be created for you, with the API limited
+ to methods or attributes available on standard file handles.
+
+ `read_data` is a string for the `read` method of the file handle to return.
+ This is an empty string by default.
+
+Using `open` as a context manager is a great way to ensure your file handles
+are closed properly and is becoming common::
+
+ with open('/some/path', 'w') as f:
+ f.write('something')
+
+The issue is that even if you mock out the call to `open` it is the
+*returned object* that is used as a context manager (and has `__enter__` and
+`__exit__` called).
+
+Mocking context managers with a :class:`MagicMock` is common enough and fiddly
+enough that a helper function is useful.
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> from mock import mock_open
+ >>> m = mock_open()
+ >>> with patch('__main__.open', m, create=True):
+ ... with open('foo', 'w') as h:
+ ... h.write('some stuff')
+ ...
+ >>> m.mock_calls
+ [call('foo', 'w'),
+ call().__enter__(),
+ call().write('some stuff'),
+ call().__exit__(None, None, None)]
+ >>> m.assert_called_once_with('foo', 'w')
+ >>> handle = m()
+ >>> handle.write.assert_called_once_with('some stuff')
+
+And for reading files:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> with patch('__main__.open', mock_open(read_data='bibble'), create=True) as m:
+ ... with open('foo') as h:
+ ... result = h.read()
+ ...
+ >>> m.assert_called_once_with('foo')
+ >>> assert result == 'bibble'
+
+
+.. _auto-speccing:
+
+Autospeccing
+============
+
+Autospeccing is based on the existing `spec` feature of mock. It limits the
+api of mocks to the api of an original object (the spec), but it is recursive
+(implemented lazily) so that attributes of mocks only have the same api as
+the attributes of the spec. In addition mocked functions / methods have the
+same call signature as the original so they raise a `TypeError` if they are
+called incorrectly.
+
+Before I explain how auto-speccing works, here's why it is needed.
+
+`Mock` is a very powerful and flexible object, but it suffers from two flaws
+when used to mock out objects from a system under test. One of these flaws is
+specific to the `Mock` api and the other is a more general problem with using
+mock objects.
+
+First the problem specific to `Mock`. `Mock` has two assert methods that are
+extremely handy: :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` and
+:meth:`~Mock.assert_called_once_with`.
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> mock = Mock(name='Thing', return_value=None)
+ >>> mock(1, 2, 3)
+ >>> mock.assert_called_once_with(1, 2, 3)
+ >>> mock(1, 2, 3)
+ >>> mock.assert_called_once_with(1, 2, 3)
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ AssertionError: Expected to be called once. Called 2 times.
+
+Because mocks auto-create attributes on demand, and allow you to call them
+with arbitrary arguments, if you misspell one of these assert methods then
+your assertion is gone:
+
+.. code-block:: pycon
+
+ >>> mock = Mock(name='Thing', return_value=None)
+ >>> mock(1, 2, 3)
+ >>> mock.assret_called_once_with(4, 5, 6)
+
+Your tests can pass silently and incorrectly because of the typo.
+
+The second issue is more general to mocking. If you refactor some of your
+code, rename members and so on, any tests for code that is still using the
+*old api* but uses mocks instead of the real objects will still pass. This
+means your tests can all pass even though your code is broken.
+
+Note that this is another reason why you need integration tests as well as
+unit tests. Testing everything in isolation is all fine and dandy, but if you
+don't test how your units are "wired together" there is still lots of room
+for bugs that tests might have caught.
+
+`mock` already provides a feature to help with this, called speccing. If you
+use a class or instance as the `spec` for a mock then you can only access
+attributes on the mock that exist on the real class:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> import urllib2
+ >>> mock = Mock(spec=urllib2.Request)
+ >>> mock.assret_called_with
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'assret_called_with'
+
+The spec only applies to the mock itself, so we still have the same issue
+with any methods on the mock:
+
+.. code-block:: pycon
+
+ >>> mock.has_data()
+ <mock.Mock object at 0x...>
+ >>> mock.has_data.assret_called_with()
+
+Auto-speccing solves this problem. You can either pass `autospec=True` to
+`patch` / `patch.object` or use the `create_autospec` function to create a
+mock with a spec. If you use the `autospec=True` argument to `patch` then the
+object that is being replaced will be used as the spec object. Because the
+speccing is done "lazily" (the spec is created as attributes on the mock are
+accessed) you can use it with very complex or deeply nested objects (like
+modules that import modules that import modules) without a big performance
+hit.
+
+Here's an example of it in use:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> import urllib2
+ >>> patcher = patch('__main__.urllib2', autospec=True)
+ >>> mock_urllib2 = patcher.start()
+ >>> urllib2 is mock_urllib2
+ True
+ >>> urllib2.Request
+ <MagicMock name='urllib2.Request' spec='Request' id='...'>
+
+You can see that `urllib2.Request` has a spec. `urllib2.Request` takes two
+arguments in the constructor (one of which is `self`). Here's what happens if
+we try to call it incorrectly:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> req = urllib2.Request()
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ TypeError: <lambda>() takes at least 2 arguments (1 given)
+
+The spec also applies to instantiated classes (i.e. the return value of
+specced mocks):
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> req = urllib2.Request('foo')
+ >>> req
+ <NonCallableMagicMock name='urllib2.Request()' spec='Request' id='...'>
+
+`Request` objects are not callable, so the return value of instantiating our
+mocked out `urllib2.Request` is a non-callable mock. With the spec in place
+any typos in our asserts will raise the correct error:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> req.add_header('spam', 'eggs')
+ <MagicMock name='urllib2.Request().add_header()' id='...'>
+ >>> req.add_header.assret_called_with
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'assret_called_with'
+ >>> req.add_header.assert_called_with('spam', 'eggs')
+
+In many cases you will just be able to add `autospec=True` to your existing
+`patch` calls and then be protected against bugs due to typos and api
+changes.
+
+As well as using `autospec` through `patch` there is a
+:func:`create_autospec` for creating autospecced mocks directly:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> import urllib2
+ >>> mock_urllib2 = create_autospec(urllib2)
+ >>> mock_urllib2.Request('foo', 'bar')
+ <NonCallableMagicMock name='mock.Request()' spec='Request' id='...'>
+
+This isn't without caveats and limitations however, which is why it is not
+the default behaviour. In order to know what attributes are available on the
+spec object, autospec has to introspect (access attributes) the spec. As you
+traverse attributes on the mock a corresponding traversal of the original
+object is happening under the hood. If any of your specced objects have
+properties or descriptors that can trigger code execution then you may not be
+able to use autospec. On the other hand it is much better to design your
+objects so that introspection is safe [#]_.
+
+A more serious problem is that it is common for instance attributes to be
+created in the `__init__` method and not to exist on the class at all.
+`autospec` can't know about any dynamically created attributes and restricts
+the api to visible attributes.
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> class Something(object):
+ ... def __init__(self):
+ ... self.a = 33
+ ...
+ >>> with patch('__main__.Something', autospec=True):
+ ... thing = Something()
+ ... thing.a
+ ...
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'a'
+
+There are a few different ways of resolving this problem. The easiest, but
+not necessarily the least annoying, way is to simply set the required
+attributes on the mock after creation. Just because `autospec` doesn't allow
+you to fetch attributes that don't exist on the spec it doesn't prevent you
+setting them:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> with patch('__main__.Something', autospec=True):
+ ... thing = Something()
+ ... thing.a = 33
+ ...
+
+There is a more aggressive version of both `spec` and `autospec` that *does*
+prevent you setting non-existent attributes. This is useful if you want to
+ensure your code only *sets* valid attributes too, but obviously it prevents
+this particular scenario:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> with patch('__main__.Something', autospec=True, spec_set=True):
+ ... thing = Something()
+ ... thing.a = 33
+ ...
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'a'
+
+Probably the best way of solving the problem is to add class attributes as
+default values for instance members initialised in `__init__`. Note that if
+you are only setting default attributes in `__init__` then providing them via
+class attributes (shared between instances of course) is faster too. e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: python
+
+ class Something(object):
+ a = 33
+
+This brings up another issue. It is relatively common to provide a default
+value of `None` for members that will later be an object of a different type.
+`None` would be useless as a spec because it wouldn't let you access *any*
+attributes or methods on it. As `None` is *never* going to be useful as a
+spec, and probably indicates a member that will normally of some other type,
+`autospec` doesn't use a spec for members that are set to `None`. These will
+just be ordinary mocks (well - `MagicMocks`):
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> class Something(object):
+ ... member = None
+ ...
+ >>> mock = create_autospec(Something)
+ >>> mock.member.foo.bar.baz()
+ <MagicMock name='mock.member.foo.bar.baz()' id='...'>
+
+If modifying your production classes to add defaults isn't to your liking
+then there are more options. One of these is simply to use an instance as the
+spec rather than the class. The other is to create a subclass of the
+production class and add the defaults to the subclass without affecting the
+production class. Both of these require you to use an alternative object as
+the spec. Thankfully `patch` supports this - you can simply pass the
+alternative object as the `autospec` argument:
+
+.. doctest::
+
+ >>> class Something(object):
+ ... def __init__(self):
+ ... self.a = 33
+ ...
+ >>> class SomethingForTest(Something):
+ ... a = 33
+ ...
+ >>> p = patch('__main__.Something', autospec=SomethingForTest)
+ >>> mock = p.start()
+ >>> mock.a
+ <NonCallableMagicMock name='Something.a' spec='int' id='...'>
+
+.. note::
+
+ An additional limitation (currently) with `autospec` is that unbound
+ methods on mocked classes *don't* take an "explicit self" as the first
+ argument - so this usage will fail with `autospec`.
+
+ .. doctest::
+
+ >>> class Foo(object):
+ ... def foo(self):
+ ... pass
+ ...
+ >>> Foo.foo(Foo())
+ >>> MockFoo = create_autospec(Foo)
+ >>> MockFoo.foo(MockFoo())
+ Traceback (most recent call last):
+ ...
+ TypeError: <lambda>() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
+
+ The reason is that its very hard to tell the difference between functions,
+ unbound methods and staticmethods across Python 2 & 3 and the alternative
+ implementations. This restriction may be fixed in future versions.
+
+
+------
+
+.. [#] This only applies to classes or already instantiated objects. Calling
+ a mocked class to create a mock instance *does not* create a real instance.
+ It is only attribute lookups - along with calls to `dir` - that are done. A
+ way round this problem would have been to use `getattr_static
+ <http://docs.python.org/dev/library/inspect.html#inspect.getattr_static>`_,
+ which can fetch attributes without triggering code execution. Descriptors
+ like `classmethod` and `staticmethod` *need* to be fetched correctly though,
+ so that their signatures can be mocked correctly.