diff options
author | Matt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain> | 2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain> | 2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500 |
commit | 5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8 (patch) | |
tree | 10027f336435511475e392454359edea8e25895d /js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js | |
parent | 49ee0794b5d912db1f95dce6eb52d781dc210db5 (diff) | |
download | UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.gz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.lz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.xz UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.zip |
Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0
Diffstat (limited to 'js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js')
-rw-r--r-- | js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js b/js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js new file mode 100644 index 000000000..146901d9d --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/jit-test/tests/atomics/mutual-exclusion.js @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +// Let a few threads hammer on memory with atomics to provoke errors +// in exclusion work. This test is not 100% fail-safe: the test may +// pass despite a bug, but this is unlikely. + +if (!(this.SharedArrayBuffer && this.getSharedArrayBuffer && this.setSharedArrayBuffer && this.evalInWorker)) + quit(0); + +try { + // This will fail with --no-threads. + evalInWorker("37"); +} +catch (e) { + quit(0); +} + +// Map an Int32Array on shared memory. The first location is used as +// a counter, each worker counts up on exit and the main thread will +// wait until the counter reaches the number of workers. The other +// elements are contended accumulators where we count up and down very +// rapidly and for a long time, any failure in mutual exclusion should +// lead to errors in the result. (For example, the test fails almost +// immediately when I disable simulation of mutual exclusion in the +// ARM simulator.) + +const numWorkers = 4; // You're not meant to change this +const iterCount = 255; // Nor this +const sabLength = 1024; // Nor this + +const oddResult = (function () { + var v = 0; + for ( var j=0 ; j < numWorkers ; j++ ) + v |= (iterCount << (8 * j)); + return v; +})(); + +const evenResult = 0; + +const sab = new SharedArrayBuffer(sabLength); + +setSharedArrayBuffer(sab); + +const iab = new Int32Array(sab); + +function testRun(limit) { + console.log("Limit = " + limit); + + // Fork off workers to hammer on memory. + for ( var i=0 ; i < numWorkers ; i++ ) { + evalInWorker(` + const iab = new Int32Array(getSharedArrayBuffer()); + const v = 1 << (8 * ${i}); + for ( var i=0 ; i < ${limit} ; i++ ) { + for ( var k=0 ; k < ${iterCount} ; k++ ) { + if (i & 1) { + for ( var j=1 ; j < iab.length ; j++ ) + Atomics.sub(iab, j, v); + } + else { + for ( var j=1 ; j < iab.length ; j++ ) + Atomics.add(iab, j, v); + } + } + } + Atomics.add(iab, 0, 1); + `); + } + + // Wait... + while (Atomics.load(iab, 0) != numWorkers) + ; + Atomics.store(iab, 0, 0); + + // Check the results and clear the array again. + const v = (limit & 1) ? oddResult : evenResult; + for ( var i=1 ; i < iab.length ; i++ ) { + assertEq(iab[i], v); + iab[i] = 0; + } +} + +// Under some configurations the test can take a while to run (and may +// saturate the CPU since it runs four workers); try not to time out. + +var then = new Date(); +testRun(1); +if (new Date() - then < 20000) { + testRun(2); + if (new Date() - then < 30000) { + testRun(3); + } +} |