| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
* The langpack is not generated via the package target but IS for mozpackage target using old behavior
* Add mach command to specifically generate the langpack when needed without the rest of the packaging routine (mach langpack)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* This adds what will eventually be a rewritten packaging routine while maintaining backwards compatibility with the original mozilla routine
* Changes the build target and installer makefile to use the alternative packaging
* Adds build target to specifically invoke the original mozilla routine
* Update mach commands accordingly
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Compared with what Pale Moon had for Solaris originally, this is mostly the same zero point I started patching from, but I've made the following changes here after reviewing all this initial code I never looked at closely before.
1. In package-manifest.in for both Basilisk and Pale Moon, I've made the SPARC code for libfreebl not interefere with the x86 code, use the proper build flags, and also updated it to allow a SPARC64 build which is more likely to be used than the 32-bit SPARC code we had there.
2. See Mozilla bug #832272 and the old rules.mk patch from around Firefox 30 in oracle/solaris-userland. I believe they screwed up NSINSTALL on Solaris when they were trying to streamline the NSS buildsystem, because they started having unexplained issues with it around that time after Firefox 22 that they never properly resolved until Mozilla began building NSS with gyp files. I'm actually not even sure how relevant the thing they broke actually is to Solaris at this point, bug 665509 is so old it predates Firefox itself and goes back to the Mozilla suite days. I believe $(INSTALL) -t was wrong, and they meant $(NSINSTALL) -t because that makes more sense and is closer to what was there originally. It's what they have for WINNT, and it's possible a fix more like that could serve for Solaris as well. Alternatively, we could get rid of all these half-broken Makefiles and start building NSS with gyp files like Mozilla did.
3. I've completely cut out support for the Sun compiler and taken into account the reality that everyone builds Firefox (and therefore its forks) with GCC now on Solaris. This alone helped clean up a lot of the uglier parts of the code.
4. I've updated all remaining SOLARIS build flags to the newer XP_SOLARIS, because the SOLARIS flag is no longer set when building Solaris.
5. I've confirmed the workaround in gtxFontconfigFonts.cpp is no longer necessary. The Solaris people got impatient about implementing a half-baked patch for a fontconfig feature that wasn't ready yet back in 2009, and somehow convinced Mozilla to patch their software to work around it when really they should have just fixed or removed their broken fontconfig patch. The feature they wanted has since been implemented properly, and no version of Solaris still uses the broken patch that required this fix. If anyone had ever properly audited this code, it would have been removed a long time ago.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
- remove stub installer leftovers
- remove maintenance service leftovers
- remove unused macros
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Tag #145
|
| |
|
|
| |
Also, keep WebExAM working for the moment
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
WebSense has moved to an extension solution instead of dll injection, so
this dummy dll (for blocking injection) is no longer necessary.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Issue #102
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
packaged product
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
- Conditionals and code blocks. (MOZ_ENABLE_PROFILER_SPS)
- Stub out several profiler-only functions.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This resolves #376.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The variables set by 'configure' for --with-system-(nss|nspr) is named
differently in UXP. This breaks packaging for palemoon when system
nss/nspr is used.
This commit corrects the name of said variables.
|
| |
|
|
| |
appropriate
|
| |
|
|
| |
basic macintosh packaging
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
as anyone can tell
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
package-manifest.in)
Issue #102
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
