1 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc b/media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4fa19b71c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/samples/sample2_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// A sample program demonstrating using Google C++ testing framework.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+
+// This sample shows how to write a more complex unit test for a class
+// that has multiple member functions.
+//
+// Usually, it's a good idea to have one test for each method in your
+// class.  You don't have to do that exactly, but it helps to keep
+// your tests organized.  You may also throw in additional tests as
+// needed.
+
+#include "sample2.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// In this example, we test the MyString class (a simple string).
+
+// Tests the default c'tor.
+TEST(MyString, DefaultConstructor) {
+  const MyString s;
+
+  // Asserts that s.c_string() returns NULL.
+  //
+  // <TechnicalDetails>
+  //
+  // If we write NULL instead of
+  //
+  //   static_cast<const char *>(NULL)
+  //
+  // in this assertion, it will generate a warning on gcc 3.4.  The
+  // reason is that EXPECT_EQ needs to know the types of its
+  // arguments in order to print them when it fails.  Since NULL is
+  // #defined as 0, the compiler will use the formatter function for
+  // int to print it.  However, gcc thinks that NULL should be used as
+  // a pointer, not an int, and therefore complains.
+  //
+  // The root of the problem is C++'s lack of distinction between the
+  // integer number 0 and the null pointer constant.  Unfortunately,
+  // we have to live with this fact.
+  //
+  // </TechnicalDetails>
+  EXPECT_STREQ(NULL, s.c_string());
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(0u, s.Length());
+}
+
+const char kHelloString[] = "Hello, world!";
+
+// Tests the c'tor that accepts a C string.
+TEST(MyString, ConstructorFromCString) {
+  const MyString s(kHelloString);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, strcmp(s.c_string(), kHelloString));
+  EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(kHelloString)/sizeof(kHelloString[0]) - 1,
+            s.Length());
+}
+
+// Tests the copy c'tor.
+TEST(MyString, CopyConstructor) {
+  const MyString s1(kHelloString);
+  const MyString s2 = s1;
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, strcmp(s2.c_string(), kHelloString));
+}
+
+// Tests the Set method.
+TEST(MyString, Set) {
+  MyString s;
+
+  s.Set(kHelloString);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, strcmp(s.c_string(), kHelloString));
+
+  // Set should work when the input pointer is the same as the one
+  // already in the MyString object.
+  s.Set(s.c_string());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, strcmp(s.c_string(), kHelloString));
+
+  // Can we set the MyString to NULL?
+  s.Set(NULL);
+  EXPECT_STREQ(NULL, s.c_string());
+}