diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'js/src/tests/ecma/LexicalConventions/7.7.3-2.js')
-rw-r--r-- | js/src/tests/ecma/LexicalConventions/7.7.3-2.js | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/tests/ecma/LexicalConventions/7.7.3-2.js b/js/src/tests/ecma/LexicalConventions/7.7.3-2.js new file mode 100644 index 000000000..41aee54e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/ecma/LexicalConventions/7.7.3-2.js @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 2; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */ +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ + + +/** + File Name: 7.7.3-2.js + ECMA Section: 7.7.3 Numeric Literals + + Description: + + This is a regression test for + http://scopus.mcom.com/bugsplat/show_bug.cgi?id=122884 + + Waldemar's comments: + + A numeric literal that starts with either '08' or '09' is interpreted as a + decimal literal; it should be an error instead. (Strictly speaking, according + to ECMA v1 such literals should be interpreted as two integers -- a zero + followed by a decimal number whose first digit is 8 or 9, but this is a bug in + ECMA that will be fixed in v2. In any case, there is no place in the grammar + where two consecutive numbers would be legal.) + + Author: christine@netscape.com + Date: 15 june 1998 + +*/ +var SECTION = "7.7.3-2"; +var VERSION = "ECMA_1"; +var TITLE = "Numeric Literals"; +var BUGNUMBER="122884"; + +startTest(); + +writeHeaderToLog( SECTION + " "+ TITLE); + +new TestCase( SECTION, + "9", + 9, + 9 ); + +new TestCase( SECTION, + "09", + 9, + 09 ); + +new TestCase( SECTION, + "099", + 99, + 099 ); + + +new TestCase( SECTION, + "077", + 63, + 077 ); + +test(); |