diff options
-rw-r--r-- | mailnews/imap/src/nsImapServerResponseParser.cpp | 124 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/mailnews/imap/src/nsImapServerResponseParser.cpp b/mailnews/imap/src/nsImapServerResponseParser.cpp index c5cc49c12..b534c4d5b 100644 --- a/mailnews/imap/src/nsImapServerResponseParser.cpp +++ b/mailnews/imap/src/nsImapServerResponseParser.cpp @@ -3110,60 +3110,132 @@ bool nsImapServerResponseParser::msg_fetch_literal(bool chunk, int32_t origin) #endif charsReadSoFar = 0; - static bool lastCRLFwasCRCRLF = false; + static bool nextChunkStartsWithNewline = false; while (ContinueParse() && !fServerConnection.DeathSignalReceived() && (charsReadSoFar < numberOfCharsInThisChunk)) { AdvanceToNextLine(); if (ContinueParse()) { - // When we split CRLF across two chunks, AdvanceToNextLine() turns the LF at the - // beginning of the next chunk into an empty line ending with CRLF, so discard - // that leading CR - bool specialLineEnding = false; - if (lastCRLFwasCRCRLF && (*fCurrentLine == '\r')) + // When "\r\n" (CRLF) is split across two chunks, the '\n' at the beginning of + // the next chunk might be set to an empty line consisting only of "\r\n". + // This is observed while running unit tests with the imap "fake" server. + // The unexpected '\r' is discarded here. However, with several real world + // servers tested, e.g., Dovecot, Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo etc., the leading + // '\r' is not inserted so the beginning line of the next chunk remains + // just '\n' and no discard is required. + // In any case, this "orphan" line is ignored and not processed below. + if (nextChunkStartsWithNewline && (*fCurrentLine == '\r')) { + // Cause fCurrentLine to point to '\n' which discards the '\r'. char *usableCurrentLine = PL_strdup(fCurrentLine + 1); PR_Free(fCurrentLine); fCurrentLine = usableCurrentLine; - specialLineEnding = true; } - // This *would* fail on data containing \0, but down below AdvanceToNextLine() in + // strlen() *would* fail on data containing \0, but the above AdvanceToNextLine() in // nsMsgLineStreamBuffer::ReadNextLine() we replace '\0' with ' ' (blank) because - // who cares about binary transparency, and anyways \0 in this context violates RFCs. + // who cares about binary transparency, and anyway \0 in this context violates RFCs. charsReadSoFar += strlen(fCurrentLine); if (!fDownloadingHeaders && fCurrentCommandIsSingleMessageFetch) { fServerConnection.ProgressEventFunctionUsingName("imapDownloadingMessage"); if (fTotalDownloadSize > 0) - fServerConnection.PercentProgressUpdateEvent(0,charsReadSoFar + origin, fTotalDownloadSize); + fServerConnection.PercentProgressUpdateEvent(0, charsReadSoFar + origin, fTotalDownloadSize); } if (charsReadSoFar > numberOfCharsInThisChunk) { - // The chunk we are receiving doesn't end in CRLF, so the last line includes - // the CRLF that comes after the literal - char *displayEndOfLine = (fCurrentLine + strlen(fCurrentLine) - (charsReadSoFar - numberOfCharsInThisChunk)); - char saveit = *displayEndOfLine; - *displayEndOfLine = 0; - fServerConnection.HandleMessageDownLoadLine(fCurrentLine, specialLineEnding || !lastChunk); - *displayEndOfLine = saveit; - lastCRLFwasCRCRLF = (*(displayEndOfLine - 1) == '\r'); + // This is the last line of a chunk. "Literal" here means actual email data and + // its EOLs, without imap protocol elements and their EOLs. End of line is + // defined by two characters \r\n (i.e., CRLF, 0xd,0xa) specified by RFC822. + // Here is an example the most typical last good line of a chunk: + // "1s8AA5i4AAvF4QAG6+sAAD0bAPsAAAAA1OAAC)\r\n", where ")\r\n" are non-literals. + // This an example of the last "good" line of a chunk that terminates with \r\n + // "FxcA/wAAAALN2gADu80ACS0nAPpVVAD1wNAABF5YAPhAJgD31+QABAAAAP8oMQD+HBwA/umj\r\n" + // followed by another line of non-literal data: + // " UID 1004)\r\n". These two are concatenated into a single string pointed to + // by fCurrentLine. The extra "non-literal data" on the last chunk line makes + // the charsReadSoFar greater than numberOfCharsInThisChunk (the configured + // chunk size). + // A problem occurs if the \r\n of the long line above is split between + // chunks and \n is contained in the next chunk. For example, if last + // lines of chunk X are: + // "/gAOC/wA/QAAAAAAAAAA8wACCvz+AgIEAAD8/P4ABQUAAPoAAAD+AAEA/voHAAQGBQD/BAQA\r" + // ")\r\n" + // and the first two lines of chunk X+1 are: + // "\n" + // "APwAAAAAmZkA/wAAAAAREQD/AAAAAquVAAbk8QAHCBAAAPD0AAP5+wABRCoA+0BgAP0AAAAA\r\n" + // The missing '\n' on the last line of chunk X must be added back and the + // line consisting only of "\n" in chunk X+1 must be ignored in order to + // produce the the correct output. This is needed to insure that the signature + // verification of cryptographically signed emails does not fail due to missing + // or extra EOL characters. Otherwise, the extra or missing \n or \r doesn't + // really matter. + // + // Special case observed only with the "fake" imap server used with TB + // unit test. When the "\r\n" at the end of a chunk is split as described + // above, the \n at the beginning of the next chunk may actually be "\r\n" + // like this example: + // Last lines of chunk X + // "/gAOC/wA/QAAAAAAAAAA8wACCvz+AgIEAAD8/P4ABQUAAPoAAAD+AAEA/voHAAQGBQD/BAQA\r" + // ")\r\n" + // and the first two lines of chunk X+1: + // "\r\n" <-- The code changes this to just "\n" like it should be. + // "APwAAAAAmZkA/wAAAAAREQD/AAAAAquVAAbk8QAHCBAAAPD0AAP5+wABRCoA+0BgAP0AAAAA\r\n" + // + // Implementation: + // Obtain pointer to last literal in chunk X, e.g., 'C' in 1st example above, + // or to the \n or \r in the other examples. + char *displayEndOfLine = + (fCurrentLine + strlen(fCurrentLine) - (charsReadSoFar - numberOfCharsInThisChunk + 1)); + // Save so original unmodified fCurrentLine is restored below. + char saveit1 = displayEndOfLine[1]; + char saveit2; + // Determine if EOL is split such that Chunk X has the \r and chunk + // X+1 has the \n. + nextChunkStartsWithNewline = (displayEndOfLine[0] == '\r'); + if (nextChunkStartsWithNewline) + { + saveit2 = displayEndOfLine[2]; + // Add the missing newline and terminate the string. + displayEndOfLine[1] = '\n'; + displayEndOfLine[2] = 0; + // This is a good thing to log. + MOZ_LOG(IMAP, mozilla::LogLevel::Info, ("PARSER: CR/LF split at chunk boundary")); + } + else + { + // Typical case where EOLs are not split. Terminate the string. + displayEndOfLine[1] = 0; + } + // Process this modified string pointed to by fCurrentLine. + fServerConnection.HandleMessageDownLoadLine(fCurrentLine, !lastChunk); + // Restore fCurrentLine's original content. + displayEndOfLine[1] = saveit1; + if (nextChunkStartsWithNewline) + displayEndOfLine[2] = saveit2; } else { - lastCRLFwasCRCRLF = (*(fCurrentLine + strlen(fCurrentLine) - 1) == '\r'); - fServerConnection.HandleMessageDownLoadLine(fCurrentLine, - specialLineEnding || (!lastChunk && (charsReadSoFar == numberOfCharsInThisChunk)), + // Not the last line of a chunk. + if (!nextChunkStartsWithNewline) + { + // Process unmodified fCurrentLine string. + fServerConnection.HandleMessageDownLoadLine(fCurrentLine, + !lastChunk && (charsReadSoFar == numberOfCharsInThisChunk), fCurrentLine); + } + else + { + // Ignore the orphan '\n' on a line by itself. + MOZ_ASSERT(strlen(fCurrentLine) == 1 && fCurrentLine[0] == '\n', + "Expect '\n' as only character in this line"); + nextChunkStartsWithNewline = false; + } } } } - // This would be a good thing to log. - if (lastCRLFwasCRCRLF) - MOZ_LOG(IMAP, mozilla::LogLevel::Info, ("PARSER: CR/LF fell on chunk boundary.")); - if (ContinueParse()) { if (charsReadSoFar > numberOfCharsInThisChunk) @@ -3181,7 +3253,7 @@ bool nsImapServerResponseParser::msg_fetch_literal(bool chunk, int32_t origin) } else { - lastCRLFwasCRCRLF = false; + nextChunkStartsWithNewline = false; } return lastChunk; } |