Merge branch 'master' into js-modules

# Conflicts:
#	modules/libpref/init/all.js

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 56 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/ecma_5/extensions/watchpoint-deletes-JSPropertyOp-setter.js b/js/src/tests/ecma_5/extensions/watchpoint-deletes-JSPropertyOp-setter.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 85410bbd4..000000000
--- a/js/src/tests/ecma_5/extensions/watchpoint-deletes-JSPropertyOp-setter.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
- * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/
- */
-
-function make_watcher(name) {
-    return function (id, oldv, newv) {
-        print("watched " + name + "[0]");
-    };
-}
-
-var o, p;
-function f(flag) {
-    if (flag) {
-        o = arguments;
-    } else {
-        p = arguments;
-        o.watch(0, make_watcher('o'));
-        p.watch(0, make_watcher('p'));
-
-        /*
-         * Previously, the watchpoint implementation actually substituted its magic setter
-         * functions for the setters of shared shapes, and then 1) carefully ignored calls
-         * to its magic setter from unrelated objects, and 2) avoided restoring the
-         * original setter until all watchpoints on that shape had been removed.
-         * 
-         * However, when the watchpoint code began using JSObject::changeProperty and
-         * js_ChangeNativePropertyAttrs to change shapes' setters, the shape tree code
-         * became conscious of the presence of watchpoints, and shared shapes between
-         * objects only when their watchpoint nature coincided. Clearing the magic setter
-         * from one object's shape would not affect other objects, because the
-         * watchpointed and non-watchpointed shapes were distinct if they were shared.
-         * 
-         * Thus, the first unwatch call must go ahead and fix p's shape, even though a
-         * watchpoint exists on the same shape in o. o's watchpoint's presence shouldn't
-         * cause 'unwatch' to leave p's magic setter in place.
-         */
-
-        /* DropWatchPointAndUnlock would see o's watchpoint, and not change p's property. */
-        p.unwatch(0);
-
-        /* DropWatchPointAndUnlock would fix o's property, but not p's; p's setter would be gone. */
-        o.unwatch(0);
-
-        /* This would fail to invoke the arguments object's setter. */
-        p[0] = 4;
-
-        /* And the formal parameter would not get updated. */
-        assertEq(flag, 4);
-    }
-}
-
-f(true);
-f(false);
-
-reportCompare(true, true);