Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0

1 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/ecma_2/RegExp/octal-003.js b/js/src/tests/ecma_2/RegExp/octal-003.js
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a73d7d40e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/ecma_2/RegExp/octal-003.js
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */
+/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
+
+
+/**
+ *  File Name:          RegExp/octal-003.js
+ *  ECMA Section:       15.7.1
+ *  Description:        Based on ECMA 2 Draft 7 February 1999
+ *  Simple test cases for matching OctalEscapeSequences.
+ *  Author:             christine@netscape.com
+ *  Date:               19 February 1999
+ *
+ *  Revised:            02 August 2002
+ *  Author:             pschwartau@netscape.com
+ *
+ *  WHY:  the original test expected the regexp /.\011/
+ *        to match 'a' + String.fromCharCode(0) + '11'
+ *
+ *  This is incorrect: the string is a 4-character string consisting of
+ *  the characters <'a'>, <nul>, <'1'>, <'1'>. By contrast, the \011 in the
+ *  regexp should be parsed as a single token: it is the octal escape sequence
+ *  for the horizontal tab character '\t' === '\u0009' === '\x09' === '\011'.
+ *
+ *  So the regexp consists of 2 characters: <any-character>, <'\t'>.
+ *  There is no match between the regexp and the string.
+ *
+ *  See the testcase ecma_3/RegExp/octal-002.js for an elaboration.
+ *
+ */
+var SECTION = "RegExp/octal-003.js";
+var VERSION = "ECMA_2";
+var TITLE   = "RegExp patterns that contain OctalEscapeSequences";
+var BUGNUMBER="http://scopus/bugsplat/show_bug.cgi?id=346132";
+
+startTest();
+
+AddRegExpCases( /.\011/, "/\\011/", "a" + String.fromCharCode(0) + "11", "a\\011", 0, null );
+
+test();
+
+function AddRegExpCases(
+  regexp, str_regexp, pattern, str_pattern, index, matches_array ) {
+
+  // prevent a runtime error
+
+  if ( regexp.exec(pattern) == null || matches_array == null ) {
+    AddTestCase(
+      regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +")",
+      matches_array,
+      regexp.exec(pattern) );
+
+    return;
+  }
+  AddTestCase(
+    str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").length",
+    matches_array.length,
+    regexp.exec(pattern).length );
+
+  AddTestCase(
+    str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").index",
+    index,
+    regexp.exec(pattern).index );
+
+  AddTestCase(
+    str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").input",
+    escape(pattern),
+    escape(regexp.exec(pattern).input) );
+
+  AddTestCase(
+    str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").toString()",
+    matches_array.toString(),
+    escape(regexp.exec(pattern).toString()) );
+
+  var limit = matches_array.length > regexp.exec(pattern).length
+    ? matches_array.length
+    : regexp.exec(pattern).length;
+
+  for ( var matches = 0; matches < limit; matches++ ) {
+    AddTestCase(
+      str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +")[" + matches +"]",
+      matches_array[matches],
+      escape(regexp.exec(pattern)[matches]) );
+  }
+
+}