summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gfx/qcms/transform_util.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain>2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500
committerMatt A. Tobin <mattatobin@localhost.localdomain>2018-02-02 04:16:08 -0500
commit5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8 (patch)
tree10027f336435511475e392454359edea8e25895d /gfx/qcms/transform_util.c
parent49ee0794b5d912db1f95dce6eb52d781dc210db5 (diff)
downloadUXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.gz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.lz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.tar.xz
UXP-5f8de423f190bbb79a62f804151bc24824fa32d8.zip
Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0
Diffstat (limited to 'gfx/qcms/transform_util.c')
-rw-r--r--gfx/qcms/transform_util.c516
1 files changed, 516 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gfx/qcms/transform_util.c b/gfx/qcms/transform_util.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f15a3f1cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gfx/qcms/transform_util.c
@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
+#include <math.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <string.h> //memcpy
+#include "qcmsint.h"
+#include "transform_util.h"
+#include "matrix.h"
+
+#define PARAMETRIC_CURVE_TYPE 0x70617261 //'para'
+
+/* value must be a value between 0 and 1 */
+//XXX: is the above a good restriction to have?
+// the output range of this functions is 0..1
+float lut_interp_linear(double input_value, uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ int upper, lower;
+ float value;
+ input_value = input_value * (length - 1); // scale to length of the array
+ upper = ceil(input_value);
+ lower = floor(input_value);
+ //XXX: can we be more performant here?
+ value = table[upper]*(1. - (upper - input_value)) + table[lower]*(upper - input_value);
+ /* scale the value */
+ return value * (1.f/65535.f);
+}
+
+/* same as above but takes and returns a uint16_t value representing a range from 0..1 */
+uint16_t lut_interp_linear16(uint16_t input_value, uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ /* Start scaling input_value to the length of the array: 65535*(length-1).
+ * We'll divide out the 65535 next */
+ uint32_t value = (input_value * (length - 1));
+ uint32_t upper = (value + 65534) / 65535; /* equivalent to ceil(value/65535) */
+ uint32_t lower = value / 65535; /* equivalent to floor(value/65535) */
+ /* interp is the distance from upper to value scaled to 0..65535 */
+ uint32_t interp = value % 65535;
+
+ value = (table[upper]*(interp) + table[lower]*(65535 - interp))/65535; // 0..65535*65535
+
+ return value;
+}
+
+/* same as above but takes an input_value from 0..PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX
+ * and returns a uint8_t value representing a range from 0..1 */
+static
+uint8_t lut_interp_linear_precache_output(uint32_t input_value, uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ /* Start scaling input_value to the length of the array: PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX*(length-1).
+ * We'll divide out the PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX next */
+ uint32_t value = (input_value * (length - 1));
+
+ /* equivalent to ceil(value/PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX) */
+ uint32_t upper = (value + PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX-1) / PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX;
+ /* equivalent to floor(value/PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX) */
+ uint32_t lower = value / PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX;
+ /* interp is the distance from upper to value scaled to 0..PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX */
+ uint32_t interp = value % PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX;
+
+ /* the table values range from 0..65535 */
+ value = (table[upper]*(interp) + table[lower]*(PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX - interp)); // 0..(65535*PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX)
+
+ /* round and scale */
+ value += (PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX*65535/255)/2;
+ value /= (PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX*65535/255); // scale to 0..255
+ return value;
+}
+
+/* value must be a value between 0 and 1 */
+//XXX: is the above a good restriction to have?
+float lut_interp_linear_float(float value, float *table, int length)
+{
+ int upper, lower;
+ value = value * (length - 1);
+ upper = ceilf(value);
+ lower = floorf(value);
+ //XXX: can we be more performant here?
+ value = table[upper]*(1. - (upper - value)) + table[lower]*(upper - value);
+ /* scale the value */
+ return value;
+}
+
+#if 0
+/* if we use a different representation i.e. one that goes from 0 to 0x1000 we can be more efficient
+ * because we can avoid the divisions and use a shifting instead */
+/* same as above but takes and returns a uint16_t value representing a range from 0..1 */
+uint16_t lut_interp_linear16(uint16_t input_value, uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ uint32_t value = (input_value * (length - 1));
+ uint32_t upper = (value + 4095) / 4096; /* equivalent to ceil(value/4096) */
+ uint32_t lower = value / 4096; /* equivalent to floor(value/4096) */
+ uint32_t interp = value % 4096;
+
+ value = (table[upper]*(interp) + table[lower]*(4096 - interp))/4096; // 0..4096*4096
+
+ return value;
+}
+#endif
+
+void compute_curve_gamma_table_type1(float gamma_table[256], uint16_t gamma)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ float gamma_float = u8Fixed8Number_to_float(gamma);
+ for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+ // 0..1^(0..255 + 255/256) will always be between 0 and 1
+ gamma_table[i] = pow(i/255., gamma_float);
+ }
+}
+
+void compute_curve_gamma_table_type2(float gamma_table[256], uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+ gamma_table[i] = lut_interp_linear(i/255., table, length);
+ }
+}
+
+void compute_curve_gamma_table_type_parametric(float gamma_table[256], float parameter[7], int count)
+{
+ size_t X;
+ float interval;
+ float a, b, c, e, f;
+ float y = parameter[0];
+ if (count == 0) {
+ a = 1;
+ b = 0;
+ c = 0;
+ e = 0;
+ f = 0;
+ interval = -1;
+ } else if(count == 1) {
+ a = parameter[1];
+ b = parameter[2];
+ c = 0;
+ e = 0;
+ f = 0;
+ interval = -1 * parameter[2] / parameter[1];
+ } else if(count == 2) {
+ a = parameter[1];
+ b = parameter[2];
+ c = 0;
+ e = parameter[3];
+ f = parameter[3];
+ interval = -1 * parameter[2] / parameter[1];
+ } else if(count == 3) {
+ a = parameter[1];
+ b = parameter[2];
+ c = parameter[3];
+ e = -c;
+ f = 0;
+ interval = parameter[4];
+ } else if(count == 4) {
+ a = parameter[1];
+ b = parameter[2];
+ c = parameter[3];
+ e = parameter[5] - c;
+ f = parameter[6];
+ interval = parameter[4];
+ } else {
+ assert(0 && "invalid parametric function type.");
+ a = 1;
+ b = 0;
+ c = 0;
+ e = 0;
+ f = 0;
+ interval = -1;
+ }
+ for (X = 0; X < 256; X++) {
+ if (X >= interval) {
+ // XXX The equations are not exactly as defined in the spec but are
+ // algebraically equivalent.
+ // TODO Should division by 255 be for the whole expression.
+ gamma_table[X] = clamp_float(pow(a * X / 255. + b, y) + c + e);
+ } else {
+ gamma_table[X] = clamp_float(c * X / 255. + f);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void compute_curve_gamma_table_type0(float gamma_table[256])
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+ gamma_table[i] = i/255.;
+ }
+}
+
+float *build_input_gamma_table(struct curveType *TRC)
+{
+ float *gamma_table;
+
+ if (!TRC) return NULL;
+ gamma_table = malloc(sizeof(float)*256);
+ if (gamma_table) {
+ if (TRC->type == PARAMETRIC_CURVE_TYPE) {
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type_parametric(gamma_table, TRC->parameter, TRC->count);
+ } else {
+ if (TRC->count == 0) {
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type0(gamma_table);
+ } else if (TRC->count == 1) {
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type1(gamma_table, TRC->data[0]);
+ } else {
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type2(gamma_table, TRC->data, TRC->count);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return gamma_table;
+}
+
+struct matrix build_colorant_matrix(qcms_profile *p)
+{
+ struct matrix result;
+ result.m[0][0] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->redColorant.X);
+ result.m[0][1] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->greenColorant.X);
+ result.m[0][2] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->blueColorant.X);
+ result.m[1][0] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->redColorant.Y);
+ result.m[1][1] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->greenColorant.Y);
+ result.m[1][2] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->blueColorant.Y);
+ result.m[2][0] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->redColorant.Z);
+ result.m[2][1] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->greenColorant.Z);
+ result.m[2][2] = s15Fixed16Number_to_float(p->blueColorant.Z);
+ result.invalid = false;
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* The following code is copied nearly directly from lcms.
+ * I think it could be much better. For example, Argyll seems to have better code in
+ * icmTable_lookup_bwd and icmTable_setup_bwd. However, for now this is a quick way
+ * to a working solution and allows for easy comparing with lcms. */
+uint16_fract_t lut_inverse_interp16(uint16_t Value, uint16_t LutTable[], int length)
+{
+ int l = 1;
+ int r = 0x10000;
+ int x = 0, res; // 'int' Give spacing for negative values
+ int NumZeroes, NumPoles;
+ int cell0, cell1;
+ double val2;
+ double y0, y1, x0, x1;
+ double a, b, f;
+
+ // July/27 2001 - Expanded to handle degenerated curves with an arbitrary
+ // number of elements containing 0 at the begining of the table (Zeroes)
+ // and another arbitrary number of poles (FFFFh) at the end.
+ // First the zero and pole extents are computed, then value is compared.
+
+ NumZeroes = 0;
+ while (LutTable[NumZeroes] == 0 && NumZeroes < length-1)
+ NumZeroes++;
+
+ // There are no zeros at the beginning and we are trying to find a zero, so
+ // return anything. It seems zero would be the less destructive choice
+ /* I'm not sure that this makes sense, but oh well... */
+ if (NumZeroes == 0 && Value == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ NumPoles = 0;
+ while (LutTable[length-1- NumPoles] == 0xFFFF && NumPoles < length-1)
+ NumPoles++;
+
+ // Does the curve belong to this case?
+ if (NumZeroes > 1 || NumPoles > 1)
+ {
+ int a, b;
+
+ // Identify if value fall downto 0 or FFFF zone
+ if (Value == 0) return 0;
+ // if (Value == 0xFFFF) return 0xFFFF;
+
+ // else restrict to valid zone
+
+ if (NumZeroes > 1) {
+ a = ((NumZeroes-1) * 0xFFFF) / (length-1);
+ l = a - 1;
+ }
+ if (NumPoles > 1) {
+ b = ((length-1 - NumPoles) * 0xFFFF) / (length-1);
+ r = b + 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (r <= l) {
+ // If this happens LutTable is not invertible
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+
+ // Seems not a degenerated case... apply binary search
+ while (r > l) {
+
+ x = (l + r) / 2;
+
+ res = (int) lut_interp_linear16((uint16_fract_t) (x-1), LutTable, length);
+
+ if (res == Value) {
+
+ // Found exact match.
+
+ return (uint16_fract_t) (x - 1);
+ }
+
+ if (res > Value) r = x - 1;
+ else l = x + 1;
+ }
+
+ // Not found, should we interpolate?
+
+ // Get surrounding nodes
+
+ assert(x >= 1);
+
+ val2 = (length-1) * ((double) (x - 1) / 65535.0);
+
+ cell0 = (int) floor(val2);
+ cell1 = (int) ceil(val2);
+
+ if (cell0 == cell1) return (uint16_fract_t) x;
+
+ y0 = LutTable[cell0] ;
+ x0 = (65535.0 * cell0) / (length-1);
+
+ y1 = LutTable[cell1] ;
+ x1 = (65535.0 * cell1) / (length-1);
+
+ a = (y1 - y0) / (x1 - x0);
+ b = y0 - a * x0;
+
+ if (fabs(a) < 0.01) return (uint16_fract_t) x;
+
+ f = ((Value - b) / a);
+
+ if (f < 0.0) return (uint16_fract_t) 0;
+ if (f >= 65535.0) return (uint16_fract_t) 0xFFFF;
+
+ return (uint16_fract_t) floor(f + 0.5);
+
+}
+
+/*
+ The number of entries needed to invert a lookup table should not
+ necessarily be the same as the original number of entries. This is
+ especially true of lookup tables that have a small number of entries.
+
+ For example:
+ Using a table like:
+ {0, 3104, 14263, 34802, 65535}
+ invert_lut will produce an inverse of:
+ {3, 34459, 47529, 56801, 65535}
+ which has an maximum error of about 9855 (pixel difference of ~38.346)
+
+ For now, we punt the decision of output size to the caller. */
+static uint16_t *invert_lut(uint16_t *table, int length, int out_length)
+{
+ int i;
+ /* for now we invert the lut by creating a lut of size out_length
+ * and attempting to lookup a value for each entry using lut_inverse_interp16 */
+ uint16_t *output = malloc(sizeof(uint16_t)*out_length);
+ if (!output)
+ return NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < out_length; i++) {
+ double x = ((double) i * 65535.) / (double) (out_length - 1);
+ uint16_fract_t input = floor(x + .5);
+ output[i] = lut_inverse_interp16(input, table, length);
+ }
+ return output;
+}
+
+static void compute_precache_pow(uint8_t *output, float gamma)
+{
+ uint32_t v = 0;
+ for (v = 0; v < PRECACHE_OUTPUT_SIZE; v++) {
+ //XXX: don't do integer/float conversion... and round?
+ output[v] = 255. * pow(v/(double)PRECACHE_OUTPUT_MAX, gamma);
+ }
+}
+
+void compute_precache_lut(uint8_t *output, uint16_t *table, int length)
+{
+ uint32_t v = 0;
+ for (v = 0; v < PRECACHE_OUTPUT_SIZE; v++) {
+ output[v] = lut_interp_linear_precache_output(v, table, length);
+ }
+}
+
+void compute_precache_linear(uint8_t *output)
+{
+ uint32_t v = 0;
+ for (v = 0; v < PRECACHE_OUTPUT_SIZE; v++) {
+ //XXX: round?
+ output[v] = v / (PRECACHE_OUTPUT_SIZE/256);
+ }
+}
+
+qcms_bool compute_precache(struct curveType *trc, uint8_t *output)
+{
+
+ if (trc->type == PARAMETRIC_CURVE_TYPE) {
+ float gamma_table[256];
+ uint16_t gamma_table_uint[256];
+ uint16_t i;
+ uint16_t *inverted;
+ int inverted_size = 256;
+
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type_parametric(gamma_table, trc->parameter, trc->count);
+ for(i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+ gamma_table_uint[i] = (uint16_t)(gamma_table[i] * 65535);
+ }
+
+ //XXX: the choice of a minimum of 256 here is not backed by any theory,
+ // measurement or data, howeve r it is what lcms uses.
+ // the maximum number we would need is 65535 because that's the
+ // accuracy used for computing the pre cache table
+ if (inverted_size < 256)
+ inverted_size = 256;
+
+ inverted = invert_lut(gamma_table_uint, 256, inverted_size);
+ if (!inverted)
+ return false;
+ compute_precache_lut(output, inverted, inverted_size);
+ free(inverted);
+ } else {
+ if (trc->count == 0) {
+ compute_precache_linear(output);
+ } else if (trc->count == 1) {
+ compute_precache_pow(output, 1./u8Fixed8Number_to_float(trc->data[0]));
+ } else {
+ uint16_t *inverted;
+ int inverted_size = trc->count;
+ //XXX: the choice of a minimum of 256 here is not backed by any theory,
+ // measurement or data, howeve r it is what lcms uses.
+ // the maximum number we would need is 65535 because that's the
+ // accuracy used for computing the pre cache table
+ if (inverted_size < 256)
+ inverted_size = 256;
+
+ inverted = invert_lut(trc->data, trc->count, inverted_size);
+ if (!inverted)
+ return false;
+ compute_precache_lut(output, inverted, inverted_size);
+ free(inverted);
+ }
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+
+static uint16_t *build_linear_table(int length)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint16_t *output = malloc(sizeof(uint16_t)*length);
+ if (!output)
+ return NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ double x = ((double) i * 65535.) / (double) (length - 1);
+ uint16_fract_t input = floor(x + .5);
+ output[i] = input;
+ }
+ return output;
+}
+
+static uint16_t *build_pow_table(float gamma, int length)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint16_t *output = malloc(sizeof(uint16_t)*length);
+ if (!output)
+ return NULL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+ uint16_fract_t result;
+ double x = ((double) i) / (double) (length - 1);
+ x = pow(x, gamma); //XXX turn this conversion into a function
+ result = floor(x*65535. + .5);
+ output[i] = result;
+ }
+ return output;
+}
+
+void build_output_lut(struct curveType *trc,
+ uint16_t **output_gamma_lut, size_t *output_gamma_lut_length)
+{
+ if (trc->type == PARAMETRIC_CURVE_TYPE) {
+ float gamma_table[256];
+ uint16_t i;
+ uint16_t *output = malloc(sizeof(uint16_t)*256);
+
+ if (!output) {
+ *output_gamma_lut = NULL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ compute_curve_gamma_table_type_parametric(gamma_table, trc->parameter, trc->count);
+ *output_gamma_lut_length = 256;
+ for(i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+ output[i] = (uint16_t)(gamma_table[i] * 65535);
+ }
+ *output_gamma_lut = output;
+ } else {
+ if (trc->count == 0) {
+ *output_gamma_lut = build_linear_table(4096);
+ *output_gamma_lut_length = 4096;
+ } else if (trc->count == 1) {
+ float gamma = 1./u8Fixed8Number_to_float(trc->data[0]);
+ *output_gamma_lut = build_pow_table(gamma, 4096);
+ *output_gamma_lut_length = 4096;
+ } else {
+ //XXX: the choice of a minimum of 256 here is not backed by any theory,
+ // measurement or data, however it is what lcms uses.
+ *output_gamma_lut_length = trc->count;
+ if (*output_gamma_lut_length < 256)
+ *output_gamma_lut_length = 256;
+
+ *output_gamma_lut = invert_lut(trc->data, trc->count, *output_gamma_lut_length);
+ }
+ }
+
+}
+