Add m-esr52 at 52.6.0

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/build/clang-plugin/tests/TestNonMemMovableStd.cpp b/build/clang-plugin/tests/TestNonMemMovableStd.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9fce52496
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/clang-plugin/tests/TestNonMemMovableStd.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#define MOZ_NEEDS_MEMMOVABLE_TYPE __attribute__((annotate("moz_needs_memmovable_type")))
+
+template<class T>
+class MOZ_NEEDS_MEMMOVABLE_TYPE Mover { T mForceInst; }; // expected-error-re 4 {{Cannot instantiate 'Mover<{{.*}}>' with non-memmovable template argument '{{.*}}'}}
+
+namespace std {
+// In theory defining things in std:: like this invokes undefined
+// behavior, but in practice it's good enough for this test case.
+template<class C> class basic_string { };
+typedef basic_string<char> string;
+template<class T, class U> class pair { T mT; U mU; }; // expected-note {{std::pair<bool, std::basic_string<char> >' is a non-memmove()able type because member 'mU' is a non-memmove()able type 'std::basic_string<char>'}}
+class arbitrary_name { };
+}
+
+class HasString { std::string m; }; // expected-note {{'HasString' is a non-memmove()able type because member 'm' is a non-memmove()able type 'std::string' (aka 'basic_string<char>')}}
+
+static Mover<std::string> bad; // expected-note {{instantiation of 'Mover<std::basic_string<char> >' requested here}}
+static Mover<HasString> bad_mem; // expected-note {{instantiation of 'Mover<HasString>' requested here}}
+static Mover<std::arbitrary_name> assumed_bad; // expected-note {{instantiation of 'Mover<std::arbitrary_name>' requested here}}
+static Mover<std::pair<bool, int>> good;
+static Mover<std::pair<bool, std::string>> not_good; // expected-note {{instantiation of 'Mover<std::pair<bool, std::basic_string<char> > >' requested here}}